- US Cyclical Factors including ROC and Real Labour Productivity Remain Sharply Positive
- But Deleveraging Accelerated Again in 1Q, Pushing Up Private Sector Savings Surplus , and and Pushing Down Loan / Deposit Ratios
- Renewed deleveraging is anomalous, and is not reflected in asset prices or straightforward risk measurements
- Renewed deleveraging is anomalous at a time of exceptionally bad bond-market value
- So the Growth Risk for the Rest of the Year Remains on the Upside
We
now have quarterly GDP numbers for the world's major economies, so
it's time to start tracking movements in the fundamental ratios which
structure the world's business cycles, starting with the US.
Our
view based on these ratios for 4Q11 were (in this piece)as follows: “. . . by
our estimate returns on capital are around their highest since 2000
and are still rising, which will continue to foster investment
spending; labour productivity continues to grow (adjusted for changes
in capital stock), which will underpin the slowly- accelerating
addition of jobs; and, most importantly, we believe that the net
develeraging of the economy which started in 2008 is now complete. We
do not expect significant re-leveraging to take place this year, but
the mere fact that deleveraging is no longer the key dynamic will
shift the economy out of its modest 2.4% annualized growth trend
which it has sustained since the end of the recession in 2009 and
towards a 3%+ rate.”
How
much of that is still right? The good news is that returns on both
capital and labour continue to rise, at an accelerating pace – the
best underlying news for a sustained business cycle upswing.
ROC
is still climbing, and this continues to fire major capital
investment spending: in nominal terms, total fixed capital investment
jumped at an annualized pace of 20.8% during 1Q. In real terms,
private capital spending rose only a miserable 1.4% annualized - but
there seems to be an unaccounted seasonal factor at work depressing
the 1Q investment numbers, since this was the best 1Q reading since
2006. Overall, nominal capital stock is probably growing around 1.2%
a year – still less than half the c4% yoy nominal GDP growth, so we
should expect ROCs to continue to rise along with asset turns.
Real
output per worker, adjusted for capital stock per worker, also
accelerated mildly to 3% during 1Q, an inflection from from 2.8% in
4Q10 which should be enough to sustain improvements in the labour
market.
All
of this suggests the US cycle should be in buoyant good health. But
it doesn't seem to be: the 2.2% annualized GDP growth recorded in 1Q
was lower than I expected, and a retreat from the 3% of 4Q11. And
there's probably more on the way, since the GDP data disappointed
even before the 'soft patch' began to show up in the data for April
and May's economy.
I
have previously explained the origins of that 'soft patch' in the
industrial sector, using changes in momentum of output, domestic
demand, inventory and export demand. I think that analysis is both
correct and useful . . . . but also incomplete.
No comments:
Post a Comment