- The changing shape of Google searches are a gigantic rolling global survey of interest and opinion probably unrivalled even by financial markets. There's never been anything like it in human history, and its relationship to that other great 24hr global survey of opinion – financial markets – has yet to be explored. So let's get to work.
Google publishes data
daily on the the frequency of a particular search-word being used for
financial searches. The data is normalized and re-normalized
relentlessly, with words assigned a score according to frequency of
search, from zero to 100. This repeated normalization means one
should not use the numbers directly as a series. But if one is
interested less in the exact score, but much more in the difference
between contrasting sets of lookup searches, the problems are not so
great.
For example, in this
first WWAT? I'm recording the scores for 'Growth' and 'Recovery',
and subtracting from them the scores for 'Recession' and
'Depression.' The point is to reveal changes in our relative
interest between the two as revealed by global financial search
patterns. Here's how it looks since February, smoothing to a 10-day
average.
Broadly, one can divide
the year so far into two phases:
- The first, up to late March, when searches for 'growth' and 'recovery' were dominant.
- The second, since late March, when that salience collapsed, with interest in 'recession' and 'depression' peaking in early April, and again at end-April.
The first downturn in
the balance of interest came as the first wave of
disappointing/shocking US regional surveys began to appear. The
second wave appears to have been coincident with an not just with the
acceptance of a US soft patch, but also the shocking discovery that
the price of the Eurozone's fiscal pact is Southern European
Depression.
In the very short term,
early May is seeing some stabilization of the flows of interest which
involves a recovery in interest in 'growth' and 'recovery' relative
to 'recession' and 'depression'.
The temptation to
'interpret' these results is hard to resist. But it would be
surprising if there were no correlation between what the financial
world is musing about as it consults Google, and the direction of key
markets. For example, how this series compares to the movement in US
bond markets. We do not yet have sufficient data to be certain, but
it looks as if the two may indeed be related – as one might
instinctively expect.
Or consider also this
chart, which compares the series with changes in movements of the
dollar, expressed as movements in the dollar vs the Special Drawing
Right basket (again, both are averaged over 10 days). Once again, it
is too early to be conclusive, but the two series do seem to share
changes in direction.
There's not enough here
yet to draw absolute conclusions – but there's more than enough to
suggest they are worth keeping an eye on.
My intention is to
develop a series of these WWAT? series to track the relative
frequency of various contrasting ideas, with the results to be
published each Tuesday. My early ideas include: 'Inflation' vs
'Deflation'; 'Oil' vs 'Shale Gas'; 'Fiscal Pact' vs 'Growth Pact'.
But please feel free to suggest possible pairings.
No comments:
Post a Comment