In 2012, the major
economies of the world will find their business cycles are less
synchronized than any time over the last ten years. The fate of the
world's major economic power-houses will rest on the underlying
fundamentals of return on capital, financial leverage, terms of trade
and policy-development.
The reason for this is
that domestic imbalances of savings and investment (recorded in
current account surpluses and deficits) are less pronounced globally
than at any time since 2001.
As a result, these
economies will also be less hostage to international capital flows
and their volatilities. Investors will gradually discover that we're
exiting the 'risk-on, risk-off' world, and backing blindly into a
world where asset discrimination once again begins to matter, a lot.
US – Accelerating Recovery
Chief beneficiary of this is the US, where we expect the recovery to
continue to accelerate throughout 2012, and we expect both the
current consensus forecast of 2.2% in 2012 (up from 1.7% in 2011),
and the US Federal Reserve's band of 2.2% to 2.7% will prove to be
excessively conservative.
By my estimate returns on capital are around their highest since 2000
and are still rising, which will continue to foster investment
spending; labour productivity continues to grow (adjusted for changes
in capital stock), which will underpin the slowly- accelerating
addition of jobs; and, most importantly, I believe that the net
develeraging of the economy which started in 2008 is now complete. I
do not expect significant re-leveraging to take place this year, but
the mere fact that deleveraging is no longer the key dynamic will
shift the economy out of its modest 2.4% annualized growth trend
which it has sustained since the end of the recession in 2009 and
towards a 3%+ rate.
As this faster growth path becomes acknowledged I expect to see bond
yields rise from their current excessively-low level (roughly 180bps
below 'fair value' in our models). For now, it is faster growth, not
higher inflation, that will do the damage to the bond markets.
This scenario faces threats from both the upside and the downside. On
the upside, if monetary velocity (GDP/M2) even stabilizes at its
current precedent low levels, then somehow we have to expect double
digit nominal GDP growth. On the downside, the cycle could be choked
off by a sustained rise in commodity prices sufficiently strong to
erode the US terms of trade sharply. What would it take? Oil at
US$140 a barrel would be threatening but not conclusive; oil at
US$165 a barrel would trigger a 'soft patch' to disrupt the recovery.
Eurozone
– Not Eurogeddon, but Recession
The ECB's
willingness to supply Eurozone banks with cheap long-term funding,
coupled with the US Federal Reserve's willingness to supply ECB with
enough dollars to plug the hole left by financial institutions'
capital flight from Europe (Eu135bn in December alone!) makes it
likely the Eurozone can avoid financial implosion this year.
But it is unlikely
to avoid recession. All three main ratios underpinning the business
cycle point towards recession: nominal GDP growth is now so slow that
asset turns and return on capital are falling – which usually
triggers a downturn in the investment cycle. Europe's terms of trade
have deteriorated back to their 2008 lows. And the pace of bank
deleveraging, which has been the most gentle of headwinds during the
last five years, is picking up dramatically. Falling returns on
capital, rock-bottom terms of trade, and accelerated deleveraging
dictate a private sector recession. And that's before the impact of
tighter public sector budget discipline is taken into account.
Nor is it easy to
expect an early exit from this recession, since the underlying
problems of competitiveness within the Eurozone are ignored entirely
by the current attempts to 'save the Euro'. Yet these issues will
eventually be addressed in one way or another. The bullish view is
that eventually Germany will reconcile itself to very rapid nominal
GDP growth, including a bout of inflation and a current account
deficit rather than watch deflationary forces consume southern
Europe. This may, in the end, be correct. But it won't be in 2012.
China – No Hard Landing, but Hard Choices
The
expectation that a hard landing will be forced on China by
combination of disappearing export growth plus mounting bad debts in
the banking system, linked both to local government and property
projects, is wrong. The Chinese government has spent two years taking
stock of the problem and trying to work out precisely who should pick
up the bills coming due. It's a fraught political problem, but at
least the money is there to pay them.
But
this is not the main worry. Rather, the wildly-successful growth
strategy pursued by China pursued in earnest since the mid-1990s is
reaching exhaustion point. Policymakers have been extremely clear in
their repeated assertions they wish to move China from an
investment-led conomy to a consumption-led economy. But to make that
transition is extremely difficult since it involves a complicated and
sensitive re-modelling of China's financial system. China has had the
best economic and financial advice on the topic that exists, but
no-one really knows what will happens when the re-modelling gets
underway in earnest this year.
Because
of this radical uncertainty, our expectation of Chinese growth
slowing to around 8% is best interpreted as an assertion that a
hard-landing will be avoided, but that the environment for all
involved in China's economy is likely to be unusually difficult and
unpredictable.
No comments:
Post a Comment